HERE IS A CHART AND ANALYSIS THAT IS A FACTOR OF 10 MORE SIGNIFICANT THAN ANYTHING RON PAUL OR ANNA HAZARE HAS EVER SAID OR DONE TO DATE. WHY? READ ON
16.09.2011 17:11 in money
Short URL for this post: www.rayservers.com/answers
QUESTIONS THAT ARE AS YET UNANSWERED BY MONEY PUNDITS
- How many sigma does the drop and rebound in this chart below represent? Why is this significant?
- Why is this the most significant chart available on the internet?
DON'T KNOW? ANSWERS ARE TO BE FOUND HERE
Short Answer: The chart above is proof that there exist entities that have conscious control over the market. The world markets can be turned off at will, just like water shuts off in the toilet. The water shut off seems to be an exponential decline in fill rate, but lo, it gets shut off.
Longer, more detailed answer is available at:
Watch on Youtube:
Some well deserved praise:
Eric deCarbonnet of MarketSkeptics deserves hearty congratulations for his insight and work. This series of videos is more significant than anything Ron Paul has ever said. Eric deCarbonnet, if you read this, please contact us by phone or by email.
ChartOfTheDay deserves praise for gathering and publishing the most significant bit of market data in recent years.
CUTTING THROUGH THE FOG OF DISINFORMATION ON THE WEB
'Every age has its peculiar folly; some scheme, project, or phantasy into which it plunges, spurred on either by the love of gain, the necessity of excitement, or the mere force of imitation. Failing in these, it has some madness, to which it is goaded by political or religious causes, or both combined.' ...
Peter the Hermit preaching the crusades
'History in her solemn page informs us, that the Crusaders were but ignorant and savage men, that their motives were those of bigotry unmitigated, and that their pathway was one of blood and tears. Romance, on the other hand, dilates upon their piety and heroism, and portrays, in her most glowing and impassioned hues, their virtue and magnanimity, the imperishable honour they acquired for themselves, and the great services they rendered to Christianity.'...
'It was universally believed that the end of the world was at hand; that the thousand years of the Apocalypse were near completion, and that Jesus Christ would descend upon Jerusalem to judge mankind. All Christendom was in commotion. A panic terror seized upon the weak, the credulous, and the guilty, who in those days formed more than nineteen-twentieths of the population. Forsaking their homes, kindred, and occupation, they crowded to Jerusalem to await the coming of the Lord, lightened, as they imagined, of a load of sin by their weary pilgrimage. To increase the panic, the stars were observed to fall from heaven, earthquakes to shake the land, and violent hurricanes to blow down the forests. All these, and more especially the meteoric phenomena, were looked upon as the forerunners of the approaching judgments. Not a meteor shot athwart the horizon that did not fill a district with alarm, and send away to Jerusalem a score of pilgrims, with staff in hand and wallet on their back, praying as they went for the remission of their sins.'
Join the dots
The ignorance and madness of people shrieking about the scandals of the missing millions - recently up the scale to trillions - of imaginary dollars (and other currencies) is unfounded hysteria because none can define what IS legal tender in the first place. How does it get printed? How, with no facts and foundation can anyone confront the distinction between money and currency?
Here we have a new crusade - yet another form of witch hunt and a newly forming inquisition, in the form of spewing hatred, to be found in 'hat and dragon' forums.
All who engage in actions and opinions with NO FOUNDATION are ready to plunge the world into a new mass madness.
Not one sleazy politician has evidenced balls and the brains to confront any of this. Even Anna Hazare in India is barking up the corruption tree when he should be reading the Finality of Settlement documents and confronting the vacuous nature of the Indian Rupee. In America, Ron Paul continues to distract the public with cries about banking, in a country when there are no banks that practice lending!
Question: Why are the politicians treasonous?
Answer: They have failed to object to the loss of their masters, the people, to pay their debts at law. The politicians together with the lawyers have legalized fraud (see UCC § 3-202 UCC § 3-402) and endorsed the passing on of stolen currency. See GSF Public Notice to Heads of State.
Question: Have the people objected to their lack of ability to pay their debts at law?
Answer: Yes. See the Minnesota Credit River Decision of 1968.
The final dirge in this essay to help you join more dots can be found here: The Decline and Fall of the United States since Benjamin Franklin created the colonial scrip and Abraham Lincoln formalized the greenback for the purpose of war. You will then see how the constitution of the United States of America ensconced the papists in the Capitol of the New World with a gullible population largely composed of new converts to the English language. You will also see that the nefarious reason for the separation of church and state was to create the new Roman religion embodied in 'the constitution' which institutes Roman Law and the parasitic religion of the crusades, the inquisitions, the witch hunts and the conquistadors - a far cry from the innocently regarded 'catholic' or 'high' church of today.
Pope Urban Preaching the Crusades
Where is your proof?
'The proof, Sir, is in the money.' - Anon.
Go read The English Constitution by Walter Bagehot, scroll to page 22. Read the next several paragraphs that show that the USA form of government generates a 'surplus' while the old English form of government says no to taxes. A surplus on a gold standard is the same as a deficit in circular debt as currency standard. A government that runs a surplus is stealing from their masters, the people, for their own purposes.
The United States of America was a trust created to steal from the gullible American people for the benefit of the people who signed the common law trust that is the united States of America.
Where is the proof? Above. Follow the money and catch the mens rea.
Question: Why is the United States of America similar to the Roman Catholic Church?
Answer: The pope is the vicar (vicarious representation) of Christ. The USA is the vicarious representation of 'life, liberty and the pursuit of happiness'. The Church of Rome pretended to teach love and compassion while torturing people for the possession of the Luther or King James Bible so that the truth of Jesus' words may not be known to the people. The USA pretends to preach democracy and freedom of speech while torturing people at Abu Grahib and Guantanomo bay and promoting bread and circuses on TV. The clergy of the RCC sodomize the young boys, the Social Services and juvenile detention centers in the USA do the same on a grander scale. The Roman Catholic Church had pre-paid indulgences for your sins, the USA has mandatory-sentencing fines for your crimes. The Roman Catholic Church is in the business of religious fraud to make soft hearted but weak minded people pay the tithe, the USA is in the business of bank fraud and tax fraud to steal the productive capacity of the world to build a parallel universe underground. Do you really want me to go on? Do you know know why George Bush and Tony Blair rushed over to kiss the Pope's ring?
Is someone doing something about this madness?
You bet. You can too!
First, stop waiting for 'dollars' to fall out of the sky, next start exchanging value for value. This means using lawful money or a contract for the delivery of lawful money as the currency of exchange, such as implemented by the Global Standard.
Learn common law. Quit whining for greater powers to be handed to the government to print money to help you.
Learn to do ratios. See the long term ratio of gold and oil in the age of automobiles here. As shown in the chart at the link, a barrel of oil in 1946 was approximately 25 Globals, it's 25 Globals today. Gold is tax free, debt free, interest free money. Just do the investigation for yourself: Put gold in a box and watch it. Does it vanish in taxation? Does interest accrue? Do you have to pay it back to God? In the times of Julius Caesar, you could buy a nice toga, the modern equivalent of which is a man's business suit. Does one ounce of gold buy you a fine suit? Yes? Does it work across time and space as money?
Common law is simply what is common law in space and time. It is always lawful and honourable to exchange substance for substance to the benefit of both parties in the exchange. Exchanging an imaginary invented liability of a particular household or commune is not necessarily acceptable to another household or commune separated in space or in time. In other words, gold is common to us and is thus lawful money. It requires no 'legal tender act' by your treasonous representatives in your capital city to make it money.
Across space, time and culture it is seen as abhorrent to kill without cause. There is no need for statutes on murder to prosecute at common law.
Across space, time and culture it is seen as abhorrent to abuse and torture children. There is no need for statutes on child abuse to prosecute at common law. Do you think the Roman Catholic Church, Administrative Judges or Social Services can get away with these crimes? Think again.
Across space, time and culture it is seen as abhorrent to defraud. There is no need for statutes on fraud to prosecute at common law.
There is no statute of limitations at common law for these crimes.
Across space, time and culture when sufficient honourable men and women capture those that transgress the above laws, justice is achieved. This is the process of a Court of Record.
Are there Courts of Record in motion to discover the facts and investigate the high and mighty? Yes.
Question: What is the fiduciary duty of a government at common law?
Answer: To protect the liberty and freedom of the people.
Question: What is liberty?
Answer: The right to create and dispose of one's creations, the right to travel and trade without limitations, to arms to protect one's life and liberty etc. See Declaration and Bill of Rights 1688/9 AD and the Magna Carta 1215 AD, both of which are declaratory of the common law.
Question What is freedom?
Answer: To do as one pleases subject to not transgressing the freedom of other men and women.
Question: How are the limits to ones freedom determined?
Answer: In a Court of Record which determines the Rule of Law.
Question: What is a Court of Record?
Answer: A court where the tribunal is independent of the magistrate amongst other things.
Question: What does that 'tribunal is independent of the magistrate designated to run the court' mean?
Answer: It means that the JUDGE does not pass judgement on the subject matter before the court, he just verifies that the rules of court are being followed. The birthright of English men and women - access to a Court of Record, is not to be found anywhere in today's legal fiction administrative courts. Even when there is a 'jury' in today's courts, it is a canned Roman jury that is fed 'facts' by the judge so they come to the conclusion that the Administrative Court wishes the jury to come to. For an example, see the recent brouhaha at the Supreme Court of the United Kingdom.
We have found that it is the fiduciary responsibility of certain people to prevent Zimbabwe style hyperinflation. Those who think releasing 'trillions of dollars' will 'end poverty' are simpletons. Ask yourselves why did Zimbabwe with trillions of dollars not prosper?
We have also discovered that there are people whose fiduciary responsibility is to safeguard the gold of the men and women of the land from being grabbed by those who would enslave the people.
We have also discovered that there is a private war with exotic weapons being waged in this regard.
Question: What is the most important and lawful duty of a parliament of the people?
Answer: To say no to taxes. See contrast between the English Parliament and American Congress in the mid 1800s described in The English Constitution by Walter Bagehot.
Question: Does power pyramid in a lawful parliament?
Answer: No. It is simple logic that representatives must have less power than the originals.
Question: Why is the Parliament of the United Kingdom today similar to the American Congress?
Answer: Because they passed the treasonous Parliament Act 1911 and began behaving like a corporate Congress.
Question: What is the lawful duty of the executive?
Answer: To propose plans that the parliament will tolerate so as to protect the essential liberty of the people.
Question: Should the executive exist at the pleasure of parliament?
Question. Can a parliament lawfully extend its privileges to enslave the people (or their King, for the King is one of the people) and bond and trade them on the market?
“Be ye King or Commoner the law is above you”- Sir Edward Coke.
Question. Can a common man prosecute the government and convict the legislators for abusing their position?
Answer. Yes. For a how-to, take a look at the Parliamentary Privileges Act 1770 in England. That is a model for any Court of Record. Anna Hazare take note!
When Ron Paul and Anna Hazare read this, please contact us for you can do more with the right information than without.
'Justice is defined as the constant and perpetual will of giving everybody his/her due.'
'In every system of morality, which I have hitherto met with, I have always remarked, that the author proceeds for some time in the ordinary ways of reasoning, and establishes the being of a God, or makes observations concerning human affairs; when all of a sudden I am surprised to find, that instead of the usual copulations of propositions, is, and is not, I meet with no proposition that is not connected with an ought, or an ought not. This change is imperceptible; but is however, of the last consequence. For as this ought, or ought not, expresses some new relation or affirmation, 'tis necessary that it should be observed and explained; and at the same time that a reason should be given; for what seems altogether inconceivable, how this new relation can be a deduction from others, which are entirely different from it.' See: Is-Ought problem also known as Hume's Gulliotine.
- David Hume.
The Is-Ought problem is addressed in the bible:
King James Version (KJV)
33 Again, ye have heard that it hath been said by them of old time, Thou shalt not forswear thyself, but shalt perform unto the Lord thine oaths:
34 But I say unto you, Swear not at all; neither by heaven; for it is God's throne:
35 Nor by the earth; for it is his footstool: neither by Jerusalem; for it is the city of the great King.
36 Neither shalt thou swear by thy head, because thou canst not make one hair white or black.
37 But let your communication be, Yea, yea; Nay, nay: for whatsoever is more than these cometh of evil.
Watch this blog!
To make comments or for relevant discussion, join the Gold Silver Crypto discussion list.
Short URL for this post: www.rayservers.com/answers